Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Coyle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Darkwind (talk) 04:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Neil Coyle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG. This may be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Boleyn (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only independent sources relate to some comments he has made, not amounting to notability. I agree that WP:TOOSOON may apply. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence that he is a "major local political" per WP:POLITICIAN. SalHamton (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all of the above, and WP:OUTCOMES. We have specifically deleted councillors' biographies before. Bearian (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.